How to read this
Support+ writes every library row itself. Nothing below is reproduced word for word. What the sources provide is the evidence — what actually helps a child — and the structure, which is the way a field organises its skills into domains and goals.
Each row inside the product also carries its own source line, so a practitioner reading one objective can see where it came from without leaving the screen.
None of the organisations named below endorses Support+ or has any involvement in it. Naming them is a requirement of the licences their material is published under, and nothing more should be read into it.
The licence names and the attribution statements below are shown in English. That is deliberate: they are the exact wording each licence requires, and translating them could weaken the attribution they exist to make.
Curriculum for Excellence Benchmarks: Physical Education (March 2017)
Education Scotland (Crown copyright)
Licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
What Support+ used: The Early, First and Second level movement statements were read for scope and rewritten as objectives for one child. Third and Fourth level were not used.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Adapted by Support+; no wording is reproduced.
Milestones: Supporting learners with complex additional support needs
Education Scotland (Crown copyright)
Licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
What Support+ used: Pre-verbal communication and functional movement statements were used as a scope reference for the speech and occupational therapy objectives.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Adapted by Support+; no wording is reproduced.
P scales: attainment targets for pupils with special educational needs (June 2017)
Department for Education (England) (Crown copyright)
Licence: Open Government Licence v2.0
What Support+ used: The Speaking and Listening progressions were used as skill ladders only. This document was withdrawn in 2022 and Support+ makes no statutory, attainment or key-stage claim on the basis of it.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v2.0. Adapted by Support+; no wording is reproduced.
Statutory framework for the early years foundation stage
Department for Education (England) (Crown copyright)
Licence: Open Government Licence v3.0
What Support+ used: Fine and gross motor descriptions were used as a scope reference.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Adapted by Support+; no wording is reproduced.
Developmental Milestones and the Early Years Learning Framework and the National Quality Standards
Australian Children's Education & Care Quality Authority (ACECQA)
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY 3.0 AU)
What Support+ used: Physical and language milestones were used as a scope reference for the occupational therapy and speech objectives.
© ACECQA, licensed under CC BY 3.0 AU. Adapted by Support+: every statement was rewritten in full, because that document states it gives no warranty of title — its content was compiled from third-party copyrighted books.
Identifying key outcome domains with underlying specific patient-reported outcomes for psychomotor therapy in mental health care in the Netherlands: a multi-phased qualitative study (2026), Quality of Life Research 35(2), article 49, doi:10.1007/s11136-025-04119-2
Albertine de Haan, Janet Moeijes, Mia Scheffers and Philip van der Wees
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
What Support+ used: Read as a scope reference while the psychomotor library was being arranged. This paper publishes FIVE outcome domains — body experience, movement experience, emotion regulation, social interaction and stress regulation — for self-reported outcomes in ADULT mental health care. No wording, no item and no domain list was taken from it.
Adapted by Support+: nothing is reproduced. The eight psychomotor domains in the Support+ library are Support+'s own arrangement, informed by this paper and not published by it. A reader should not expect to find them in the article.
Validity and reliability of the revised Arabic language test for 2-4-year-old children: cross-sectional study (2021), The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology 37(1), article 26, doi:10.1186/s43163-021-00088-8
Nahla Rifaie, Tarek Mohamed Abdel Wahab Hamza and Yomna Hassan Elfiky
Licence: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)
What Support+ used: The five-part architecture this paper scores — semantics, receptive syntax, expressive syntax, pragmatics and phonology — as a frame for organising the speech objectives. No test item was used.
Adapted by Support+: structure only, all wording original. The CC BY 4.0 licence is on this article. It is not a licence over the Arabic Language Test itself: that instrument was designed and standardised by Kotby and colleagues in 1995, it is a proprietary clinical test, and it is not licensed to Support+.
What Works Clearinghouse practice guides on behaviour, reading, mathematics, writing and preparing young children for school
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences
Licence: Public domain (a work of the U.S. Government)
What Support+ used: The evidence and the recommendation structure behind the shared recommendation library and the academic objectives. Each guide states in its own pages that it is in the public domain.
Adapted by Support+: every row is written afresh for one child, because the guides address a class of twenty-five.
Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework: Ages Birth to Five (2015)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Head Start
Licence: Structure used as an uncopyrightable system of organisation
What Support+ used: The domain taxonomy only, as a factual scaffold for the early-childhood objectives.
Support+ wrote every objective itself. This document prints no rights statement of any kind — no copyright page, no permission notice — so Support+ relies only on the principle that a system of organisation is not protected by copyright, and reproduces none of its wording.
What is not here
Support+ deliberately ships no ready-made content for psychotherapy, sensory integration, or articulation, phonology, fluency and voice. No openly licensed professional source for them exists, and writing them without one would mean inventing clinical content in the areas where that matters most.
A practice can of course write its own, in its own library, in either language.